I don’t really know how to feel about this ending. She is shocked and confused at first, but ultimately goes with it and the two live happily ever after. Only after a period of time has past and the two become friends in real life does Joe reveal himself to Kathleen has her internet penpal. He then proceeds to befriend her as hisself and apologize to her. This happens AFTER Joe figures out that Kathleen is the person he’s been talking to online and after he admits to himself that he loves her.
SLEEPLESS IN SEATLE FILM MOVIE
The only thing I dislike about this movie is the fact that (MAJOR SPOILERS UNTIL THE END OF THIS PARAGRAPH) Joe’s superstore eventually puts Kathleen’s shop out of business, as well as puts her and all of her employees out of a job. If you enjoy a good Enemies To Lovers story, then this one is a good one for you! I am not much of a romcom person, but this one ticks all my boxes. I just watched this movie for the first time on the 23rd and I already love it. I don’t want to say anymore because this is an amazing movie and you should go watch it right now (it’s on Hulu!). Over the course of the film, Joe realizes that Kathleen is the person online that he’s been talking with online… only after he’s realized that he’s in love with her. When the two meet in person, as Joe’s corporate store encroaches on Kathleen’s small shop, they are not very fond of one another at all. The two met in a chatroom online and know nothing about each other, but have become good friends over email nonetheless. Joe Fox (Tom Hanks), the owner of a corporate chain bookstore, and Kathleen Kelly (Meg Ryan), the owner of a small, children’s oriented bookshop. The end result is a decent drama that never entirely lives up to its place as a classic romcom, with the typically stellar work from both Hanks and Ryan often buoying the proceedings through its more overtly ineffective stretches.So “You’ve Got Mail” follows the story of two competing booksellers as they fall in love. (There are, admittedly, a small handful of exceptions to this, including a high-water-mark interlude detailing Sam’s conversation on the aforementioned radio show.) Despite its somewhat uninvolving atmosphere, however, the picture remains fairly watchable throughout and it’s worth noting, certainly, that it generally succeeds more as a character study than as a full-fledged romance (eg Sam’s ongoing efforts at moving on with his life are quite stirring and emotionally resonant) – which ultimately ensures that the climactic coupling isn’t quite able to pack the heartwarming punch Ephron has surely intended. Ward and Jeff Arch, delivers a slow-moving narrative that keeps Hanks and Ryan’s respective characters apart for the majority of the movie’s runtime, and there’s little doubt that the film, as a result, suffers from a somewhat erratic atmosphere that’s allayed by the two stars’ undeniably charismatic work – although, by that same token, it’s clear that Sleepless in Seattle does suffer from a dearth of wholeheartedly memorable sequences. Filmmaker Ephron, working from a script written with David S. Directed by Nora Ephron, Sleepless in Seattle follows Meg Ryan’s Annie Reed as she finds herself falling for a man (Tom Hanks’ Sam Baldwin) she’s never met after hearing him speak of his grief on a national radio show – with the storyline detailing the separate exploits of the two figures as she prepares for her marriage to Bill Pullman’s boring Walter and he finally begins dating again.
0 kommentar(er)
